Another nail in the coffin
21 08 2008If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!
I’m not talking about MixAction. That’s doing just fine, though I did manage to temporarily screw up this blog for half an hour today when adding a plugin. It re-wrote CSS and other stuff that I’m pretty sure it wasn’t supposed to do. Lesson learned. I now have WordPress installed on a VM locally and test plugin’s before installation. ;-) While I was at it I changed the theme. Still not what I want, but it’s a theme with more space on the page, so it’s closer…
If you’re a regular reader you’ll know I have an extremely low opinion of software download sites. I blogged about them recently.
Today a developer, Julian Moss , whom I mentioned had problems with McAfee’s SiteAdvisor posted an interesting result, which he admits was an accident, but none the less extremely relevant to ISV’s.
Julian explains that he created a PAD file as usual for submission to download sites for a recently released product. He did the usual submissions, accidentally deleted the content on his own site and used the PAD file description to replace that content. It was then he noticed:
Hmm. Sounding a bit like the conclusion I came to in the article I wrote, hey? Not that the conclusion was rocket science, but it’s certainly noteworthy that Julian concludes:
Right on. Exactly. So where is the SEO advantage here to the ISV? I’d love it if somebody could explain that one.
But, to be fair it’s OK for people like me to bitch and moan and rattle. But what’s an ISV to do? Without the download site it’s tough to get top score in Google, right?
Not necessarily. But that’s a post for another day. I’m aiming for Sunday on that one as it deserves some attention to detail.
Scott Kane
Quote of the day:
Thanks to TV and for the convenience of TV, you can only be one of two kinds of human beings, either a liberal or a conservative. - Kurt Vonnegut
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.























Recent Comments